Ellie Soriano
HCOM 214
Blake Rodgers
4th March 2015
Annie Leonard's Story of Stuff
The first video shown in class, the Story of Stuff, brought
global conflict into perspective and created reason for mass communication to
help make the world a better place. Her message was to show the destructive and
doomed path of linear consumption from the first to beginning steps. She
explained the negative effects of the way that a majority of people in the
world is hurting our environment and how it will affect us as a whole in the
long run. Her clear goal and message at the end of the video was to get people
thinking about changing their ways and becoming proactive in bettering the
system of communication.
I believe that her audience were those of the younger more
impressionable and active generations more specifically people of the ages of
thirty to teens. I think her audience were those of younger generations due to
the style the video is made in, in reference to the cartoons visually
expressing her oral speech, as well as mentioning how the current main method
of consumption will be affecting our future.
The risks and constant statistics of toxins is a leading
topic she uses to convince people through fear to listen to what she has to say
as well as emotional anger in the audience having to do with saying how we as
people will basically be screwed over and can’t change anything if no one is
active to change the way they consume products.
I do not think that Leonard is very bias in her speech and
research even though she claims that the main cause of our society doing bad to
the world due to linear consumption because I believe the leading cause of this
‘doomed consumption’ is indeed corporations.
I think she has very general and good resolutions to making
a cycle of consumption rather than a linear ‘cycle’. I agree with her
resolutions and that people should change their ways for the better of this
planet’s long term future, the resolution that I agree with the most that she
suggested was making the economy and market more local rather than
international as well as adjusting people’s mindsets on making renewable and
clean energy more mainstream.
I think what Leonard says affects everyone because we live
on the same planet even though not everyone contributes to a more doomed
planet. The main conflict in this video is actually after it is watched and
what people will do in response. Getting people to become active to better our
planet will be the most difficult part of conflict relating to this topic as
well as getting people to believe that ‘Better’ is actually better than ‘More’.
The most difficult part of communication will be getting large communities
together to go against large corporations and changing policies within the
government. However, despite all the difficulties it will take I think that
people as a whole in the world will be able to change for the greater good.
Ellie, I like your thoughtful analysis of this movie. You do a great job at identifying the message, intended audience, and core strengths of the film. I also like how you identify a conflict in the film as what people do in reaction to it, the difficulty of us all to get off the consumption treadmill and work towards better rather than more.
ReplyDelete